[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Ethics::
peer-review::
Indexing::
article types::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal DOI

AWT IMAGE

..
Copyright Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
..
:: Volume 26 - ::
J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2024; Volume 26 Back to browse issues page
Accuracy and Concordance of Orthodontic Cephalometric Analyses Using the CephNinja® Program Compared to the Traditional Method
A Hajian-Tilaki , N Kariminasab , K Hajian-Tilaki , D Maleki *
4.Dental Sciences Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, I.R.Iran. , dinamaleki74@gmail.com
Abstract:   (781 Views)
Background and Objective: Cephalometric analyses are an important tool for diagnosis and orthodontic treatment planning. Some cephalometric analysis programs cannot be used due to the high cost and inability to use all the facilities due to the sanctions. CephNinja® is an available program for cephalometric analyses. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of the CephNinja® program for orthodontic cephalometric tracing and compare it with the common manual method in Iranian society.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 100 lateral cephalometric radiographs prepared by the 3D Promax device; The patient's teeth were selected to be in maximum intercuspation and the patient's head was in natural head posture. In every 100 lateral cephalometric radiographs, 24 landmarks were identified and then 20 desired variables were measured by traditional manual method based on Steiner's analysis. Also, the digital file of the same 100 lateral cephalometric radiographs was entered into the CephNinja® software (version 3.51). Again, 24 landmarks were determined and then 20 desired variables were measured based on Steiner's analysis. The obtained data were entered into the software and compared.
Findings: The average ANB was 4.02±3.01 degrees in the traditional manual method and 3.08±4.04 degrees in the CephNinja® method. The average Wits was -1.12±3.90 mm in the traditional manual method and -1.13±4.16 mm in the CephNinja® method. The results show that there is no significant difference in the measurements of the two traditional manual methods and the CephNinja® software.
Conclusion: Based on the current study, it can be concluded that CephNinja® software is reliable and can be used similar to traditional manual method for cephalometric analysis in orthodontic patients.
Keywords: Orthodontics, Cephalometry, Analysis, Software.
Full-Text [PDF 307 kb]   (155 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Cross Sectional | Subject: Dentistry (Orthodontics)
Received: 2022/12/10 | Accepted: 2023/05/7 | Published: 2024/02/14
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hajian-Tilaki A, Kariminasab N, Hajian-Tilaki K, Maleki D. Accuracy and Concordance of Orthodontic Cephalometric Analyses Using the CephNinja® Program Compared to the Traditional Method. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2024; 26
URL: http://jbums.org/article-1-11142-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 26 - Back to browse issues page
مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences

The Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 41 queries by YEKTAWEB 4652